Alternatively, see option 4 for an easier way to complete this without a major fight and obtaining more gold from Kematu. They then want you to lure her out to the Whiterun Stables. Kematu will paralyze her there and give you G as a reward. Also, if you talk to Kematu, he claims that she was the actual traitor. After completing the quest, kill Kematu anyway. Saadia will eventually regain her ability to move, needless to say, she's pretty p'oed at you.
Kill her and steal her stuff. Complete the quest up to the point where you get to choose to "speak to" or "kill Kematu" in Swindler's Den. Opt to speak and agree to bring Saadia to the stables. Back at Whiterun, convince Saadia to leave as above. Run to the stables ahead of Saadia. Kematu will be waiting. Rush up to him and kill him there without all his bodyguards to protect him Search his body for booty, g, some armour and his two scimitars.
So after all that, my humble opinion is Of course I don't feel great about sending her off to most likely face execution, but most things are unpleasent on the personal level. Sorry about the misspelling and typos :P Hope this helps everyone out cause I was just as hung up on this quest as well. First of all if your man enough you will kill them all I really had fun in killing them all with my newfound shout that helpt giving me time by shouting them off the high ground into the river.
Secondly if you are a man you will always choose the side of a woman in need! Thirdly last but not least, isn't Skyrim much more awsome if your choice is something thats most heroic, like you tell Avulstein in Missing in Action that he should stay home and that you alone will take care of it all!
Login Register. Please help by answering unanswered questions! Register and earn badges for helping! Sponsored by RemoteLearning. Read the RemoteLearning. Ask YOUR question:. I helped Kematu. Saadia seemed insincere. She appeared sociopathic and was not in the least bit concerned about murdering for her. Kematu didn't want anyone murdered. That was a kicker right there.
Bottom line: She isn't trustworthy. Women keeping secrets rarely are. If you side with Kematu does he give you a quest after it? Same for saadia commented 9 years ago by anonymous. I think the title of the quest is debatable here. I was going to kill Kematu and all but then when i stod infron of him I changed my mind and sided with him. Got g and I didn't like Saadia anyways Well, id take Kematu's side BUT, when i talked to the prisoner he said if i knew Kematu's name i knew that to meet him means certain death.
Lets see whos really certain death to meet. Everyone who plays skyrim is sexist and afraid of women. That is why they think she is lying. First of all, on EVERY forum, people say that she was JUST going to be captured, so she shouldn't want the alik'r killed, when in reality, she clearly stated that she was going to be executed. Secondly, people expect, because she is a woman, for her to be oh-so-thankful for a strong man rescuing her and that she should act like a little girl and subjugate herself before you if you help her.
This mistrust of women is so typical of American society. Shame on you all. All of the arguments stating that there is evidence of her lying are bullshit sexist arguments, that don't even acknowledge the facts that 1. If she is telling the truth, she has a right to be paranoid about these guys enough to want them dead. Your father? ITT: woman logic. Saadia showed me some cleavage and aroused me so I sided with her commented 9 years ago by anonymous.
So you sided with them because of a gut feeling, based on how she "seemed" to be lying. But really you have no reason. You simply don't trust women.
BTW I'm a dude. So you think that because kematu told the truth about being linked to the falmor, everything that he does and is connected to is automatically correct?
That's like the christian fundementalists saying "well some places in the bible are real places therefore it must all be true. So as long as a so called government is ok with it then it's not murder huh? Why would the thalmor hire redguards who they hate to kill one woman?
Redguards and thalmor have been fighting ever since the great war, if the thalmor needed assassins they would find someone more reliable and someones who's on their side. Plus no renown redguard mercenary would dare work for the thalmor, they would be killed if they returned to hammerfell. So her story comes off as bullshit. No, you will NOT have a Thalmor agent try to kill you if you choose one side or the other in this quest.
If you encountered a justicar with an execution order, it has nothing whatsoever to do with this quest. That only triggers if you kill a Thalmor. Where did you read that in any of that post..? Cliche misogyny and melodramatic reaction to said misogyny aside, I sided with Saadia because of a few reasons: 1. The prisoner said that Kematu is dangerous and would kill anyone on sight. When I found Kematu, he was hanging out in a cave with a bunch of bandits.
Said bandits tried to kill me. Only when I slaughtered all the bandits did Kematu suddenly come up to me and say, "Gee, I don't want anyone to get killed! Kematu's vocal inflections led me to think he was lying though it could just be crappy voice acting lol.
Kematu offered zero evidence to support his allegations. In fact, he wouldn't even describe what specifically she did to sell her city out. Kematu acknowledged that it was the rival nobles who brought the charges against her.
They could just as easily have fabricated those charges as an excuse to execute her. Saada just wanted to be left in peace. Unlike Kematu, she wasn't hanging out with bandits who go around killing innocent travelers. If Kematu had offered to leave Skyrim empty-handed, I would've allowed him to leave without killing him. He's the one who forced the issue.
Saadia seemed trustworthy enough to me. I'm guessing there's something about Skyrim that appeals to bitter ex-husbands, hence the "women can't be trusted! Ah I see. And to address a few of your points: 1. The prisoner assumed you were going to try and kill him, it wouldn't make much sense for him to kill everyone he sees 2.
Its not like he was working with the bandits, one of the bandits even said he doesn't trust them. And if you were a measly bandit hanging out in a cave would you try to tell a squad of hammerfell mercenaries that they cant hang out in the back? I'm assuming he knows you came there for a reason, and waits to hear you out, you did just slaughter the bandits who owned the place he was crashing in just to see him after all.
Saadia sounded like she was lying too, then again the voice acting leaves alot to be desired. His reasons make alot more sense in the context of the game and its lore than hers, and what evidence does she give? No he didn't? He was hired by one of cities of hammerfell to bring her back after she sold out another city to the elves.
You're also confusing who her supposed enemies are, she claims the aldmeri dominion are after her, not some rival noble house. Of course she wanted peace! I would too if i was accused of treason 9. He was hired to bring her back, he apparently is quite famous in hammerfell so of course he inst going to just go away empty handed.
I'm not basing her guiltiness on anything but what common sense and in game lore backs up. Sorry about the format, my phones acting up and i was tired of rearranging it lol. One more thing concerning 9: She's the one who forced the issue if you think about it, she sent you to kill all of them. If she was honestly running for her live I think you could have asked you to try and smuggle her out of the city first.. Ok, I finally get that it seems odd to many that she would be punished for speaking out against the thalmor.
However considering a major figure in skyrim is a sleeper agent for the thalmor, it wouldn't surprise me if this group of redguard could also be rogue. In fact, by their aggression I would expect it. To me that's assuming quite alot just for an unimportant side quest that has no bearing on the game really, you' re basically writing your own little back story at this point lol. Its cool though it is a RPG, you're supposed to role play however suits you.
The way I see it, anyone who is as aggressive as the kematu were, must die. If they want to extradite a prisoner, they have to give a more specific reason, provide evidence, etc. Rule of law. Basically they just come into my country trying to capture a refugee with a vague explanation. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if people in cities like Markarth would be killed for speaking out against the thalmor.
When Ulfric was in cahoots with the thalmor he murdered many citizens of markarth. Perhaps at their direction. How would he lawfully do do it? He wasn't allowed in the city, and i doubt the jarl would take any interest in the matter. He really wasn't aggressive either, you're mistaking them for the bandits in the cave, the alikr never attack you unless you tell kematu that you're going to kill him.
Also, ulfric never worked for the thalmor, in fact he liberated markarth from the forsworn at the request of the previous jarl of markarths son his father was killed by the forsworn , who agreed to allow the worship worship of talos after the city was liberated. The thalmor had nothing to do with anything going on in markarth, and the only time ulfric has had any contact with them was when he was their prisoner, after that he was never "in cahoots" with them. Also the claim that he killed anyone in markarth other than the forsworn is thought to be imperial propaganda.
Why would he kill innocent nords who he hopes to lead in a rebellion? That wouldn't give him much public support. And in regards to ulfric being a thalmor sleeper agent, if that is who you mean, if you read his dossier its clear that the thalmor are in no way controlling or having any contact with him, its just that his rebellion is weakening the empire, which benefits the thalmor more than anything.
Ulfric doesn't even realize he's doing exactly what they want. To the person near the top who has nothing better to do than judge people for how they play a game: that makes you a hypacrite. Not only are you being sexist to men by not looking at both sides but also racist because kematu is black.
The problem in society is not that peoople are sexist but that they try to find problems in everytimy little thing lik a silly video game that's just for fun commented 9 years ago by anonymous. So everytime i dont like something that a black person does, im racist? That's profoundly stupid.
Be careful or you might never recover from such a comprehensively stupid statement 2. I am not objecting to the possibility that kematu was in the right, I am objecting to the common arguments put forward on this and other forums stating that saadia "seemed" to be lying, or stating that she would not be killed if caught. You came to a forum that is discussing one of those tiny problems. And you brought yourself to my level by calling me racist and sexist On the slim chance that you understood any of the points I just made, feel free to respond.
But please try to understand them first. To the person who I've been going back and forth on about the legality of extradition, etc: I can see clearly that as an imperialist, I will not agree with you on this subject. However, I appreciate your perspective, and you almost convinced me.
But not quite. I'm not taking sides on the whole racist thing that was out of nowhere but here's how I see the sexist argument. One commenter doesn't trust one woman because he thinks she's insincere, which is a valid point. However instead of being civil about it you rant about how all skyrim players are sexist.
First of all, if all skyrim players are sexist, and you play skyrim, what does that make you? Also, how exactly can you generalize an entire demographic over a few comments you've seen? That doesn't make any sense. There are multiples things in game that support that saadia IS lying, but instead of commenting or refuting any of those you decided that the better strategy was to go on a women's rights crusade.
What I'm saying is, you probably could have handled the situation better. That was an exaggeration, ill admit, however at the time of my original posting, the discussion was dominated by people saying that she was the aggressor, or saying that she "seemed" dishonest without any legit reason.
If you can't handle a little embellishment, you should get off the internet for your own sanity's sake. I stand by my assertion that skyrim players are generally sexist. For example the elder scrolls wiki entry for saadia states that she first claimed not to know that the alikr were in the city, but then later admitted to knowing that one of them was recently arrested.
In fact, she never claimed ignorance, and on the contrary was surprised that they knew her location. Another example of distortion of her character is how everyone said that she told the player to kill everyone. As someone else pointed out below, she only told you to kill one person.
Also, while she was holding a decent job, the prisoner arrested by the empire stated that kematu was a reckless and violent individual. I could have gone into more detail as i have above, but I thought I would summarize by saying that the arguments against her were frequently bs, and seemed to be sexist. Humans aren't good at knowing when someone is lying. There is scientific research that supports this.
However, people overwhelmingly decided that she was lying. What is the hidden variable? If you can give me another reason why people generally sided with kematu, go ahead.
There are multiple reasons I've already mentioned, to you I believe. Refer back to, "why would the thalmor hire redguards.. And to address a few of your points. Apparently you've already forgotten all of them by now. Also you didn't even respond to my last point, but i'll still be happy to counter any arguments you can make for saadia another than the sexism thing. Also, where exactly was the discussion being dominated by sexism? I see one post above your own rant that mentioned anything remotely sexist.
Maybe take some reading comprehension classes? I said they were dominated by people saying she was the aggressor. After this initial error, you just copy and paste someone elses argument. I'm sorry that your brain is a quivering pile of shit, I don't know what to tell you So stop fucking wasting my time reiterating arguments that I've already addressed.
You're so far removed from my level of sophistication that i feel like Muhammad ali fighting a baby. As I stated above, i'm not against the possibility of kematu being correct, rather i am surprised by how few people sided with saadia considering that both sides have legitimate claims.
So there is no reason for us to be arguing if you can't distinguish between 1. Saadia's lying, kematu doesn't need any sort of warrant and you're a fucking idiot who doesn't know how to make a single valid argument. Also p. Ah I forgot one thing to address. When you meet her in whiterun she absolutely does claim that she didn't know the alikr are in the city, and later tells you to go to the jail to talk to one that's been arrested.
How exactly does she know he's there again? No she doesn't i just watched a walkthrough. She says "So they know where I am? Something In the form of a question i. Imperial soldiers don't make laws, they enforce them.
The emperor makes the laws of skyrim, and the jarls make local decisions. I was almost executed because I was crossing into skyrim at the same time as Ulfric. Imagine sneaking into the united states in the company of an al qaeda leader. Why they are circumstantial: they fail to prove her guilt, only suggest it, whereas the alikr are definitely guilty of conducting an extradition without the permission of local government.
Idk if it was you who was talking about ulfric as a sleeper. I disagree with the analysis of the dossier that claims that he never was in thalmor control. He was in control up until a point, after which he was no longer in their direct control. Anyway, what pissed me off, in case you're interested is that you said "These posts all refuted every one of your arguments while proving that you should side with kematu and that the sexism argument is a moot point.
How does she know he's there? Idk what you are suggesting How would she know he was there even if she was lying? Is she telekinetically linked to her pursuers? She knows from words of mouth around the city. Same as everyone else. Why would you state the points you've already made instead of responding to my points.
Illegal extradition, circumstantial evidence. The idea of innocent until proven guilty? Here's how I see it, the alikr are guilty of unlawful extradition which i doubt is even a thing in the elder scrolls universe however saadia is without a doubt lying about the alikr working with the thalmor, that is obvious to anyone with any lore knowledge. Thus the alikr's position is more believable and it's actually reasonale compared to saadias.
It seems that you grasp this and your only stance on the issue is that the alikr should lawfully extradite her, but as ive said before they aren't allowed into the city, so how is it that this should be done? And I have responded to every argument you've made about in game situations.
I'd like to hear one of your arguments about why you believe saadia is the right choice that has in game facts to support it, nothing about our laws or real world situations. My system of ethics is based on the real world, because that is where we all live the vast majority of the time, so I can't divorce myself completely from that. Now to address once again the status of thalmor in skyrim and hammerfell.
I realize that the thalmor were recently pushed out of both hammerfell and skyrim. Therefore it would seem strange for her to be in trouble for speaking out against the thalmor. However, I don't think it's impossible or even unlikely. The problem with the logic you've presented is that it implies that no one will ever get in trouble, within the boarders of hammerfell, for speaking out against the thalmor. It is Akin to the notion that no one in afghanistan could possibly get in trouble for insulting the taliban, because officially, the taliban doesn't exist in afghanistan anymore, as they were ousted.
A logical first step would be to infiltrate certain key power structures within hammerfell. Imagine if she was telling the truth: you just sold her out to the thalmor simply because you were too lazy to make sure their story story was true. The flaw in your argument about the taliban is that they were a grass roots organization from within afghanistan that has support there.
The thalmor were foreign invaders in hammerfell without any internal support and were absolutely hated. Even if a few british spies tried to kill them the american wouldn't flee to canada, he would just go to the American authorities in a safer town.
I think there are better analogies. Britain was separated by an ocean Espionage was much more difficult to orchestrate for the British than it would be for the Thalmor I would say that the troubles in Irish history are a better anology.
Families would betray one another to various warring groups and militias. Anyway, the specific analogous situation isn't all that important. In any case, why would you go to another town where the spies could just find you. If I was being chased by spies I would to go an embassy. In a world where life is very cheap, like skyrim, it would make more sense to forego the embassy and just cross boarders.
Why attract attention to yourself? Make your pursuers attract the attention. She is not using either. She is using the base slider, for somethings. So apparently she crawled outside her mother's womb to sell out Hammerfell, then crawled back inside for a few more years waiting to be born. Or perhaps she jumped in her Tardis and went back in time to do it. That is not to say that her side of the tale is any less ludicrous of course.
She did something to tick somebody off. What it was, whether or not she was justified, we will never know. All this quest really shows is that Redguards are the worst liars on the planet. None of them can invent a story that is even remotely plausible.
That's fairly obvious, but how does that make her a traitor?
0コメント